🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.specification
Article #275

Re: Specification v. design languages (was Re: Goals, Cost, and Flexibility)

#275
From: Bernard Berthomieu,28c,6408
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1992 09:19
115 lines
5525 bytes
In article 11643@topaz.comlab.ox.ac.uk, bowen@prg.ox.ac.uk (Jonathan Bowen) writes:
>In article <Bw4MuE.8GL@exnet.co.uk> dhd@exnet.co.uk (Damon) writes:
>>In article <1992Oct14.040754.14470@CS.ORST.EDU>
>> crowl@jade.CS.ORST.EDU (Lawrence Crowl) writes:
>>>
>>>....
>
>>SML, on the other hand, even though it is not completely characterised,
>>is much nearer the mark and can actually execute too.  Quite quickly in
>>fact, since what optimisations are permissible can be worked out...
>
>Yes, SML is great for prototyping, and may be fast enough in practice
>as well for some applications. But it is executable (you have to think
>about *how* it is going to run, not just *what* you want to do), so it
>is not ideal for specification. And non-deterministic specifications
>which allow the designer freedom of choice in certain aspects of the
>design which need not be fixed at the specification stage are of course
>impossible.
>
>>CCS is a great spec language for concurrency.  Might make a good
>>parallel asm language.
>
>CCS (and CSP) are great *design* languages if you are targeting
>your implementation onto a parallel system. You may also want to
>think about the system at a more abstract level (e.g., at the
>requirements stage).
>
>>In fact I've done CCS -> SML -> C, but actually demoed the SML in
>>real-time for a network router.
>
>Great! I'd be interested to hear about the mapping from CCS to SML.
>Can this (was this) undertaken in a rigorous and systematic manner?
>
>-- 
>
>--
>Jonathan Bowen, <Jonathan.Bowen@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
>Oxford University Computing Laboratory.

I'm taking the opportunity to place an announcement for the latest release 
of LCS, a programming language based upon SML and CCS. In addition to
core SML capabilities, LCS allows one to declare and run CCS-extended 
behaviors. It also provides facilities for monomorphic user overloadings.

The standard ftp distribution notice follows.

Bernard Berthomieu.
(address at the end of the message)


======================================================================
Summary of features:

LCS (a Language for Communicating Systems) is designed as an extension
of core Standard  ML with behaviors  and processes based  upon an high
order extension of Robin Milner's CCS formalism.

Behaviors are defined in an SML framework as values of specific types,
which may be turned into processes.  LCS supports all constructions of
CCS, plus  behavior passing, computed communication  lines, support of
side effects  (both  strong  and  light  processes) and an   exception
mechanism at process  level.  Specific behavior types  assign possibly
polymorphic types with every communication labels.

Two  user  interfaces are  provided:  an  Execution   interface  and a
Simulator.   In addition  to  the    capabilities  of  a  Standard  ML
environment, the LCS executive adds  those  of  defining behaviors and
managing processes created from these behaviors.  The simulator allows
the  user  to  control the  expansion of  a behavior, with  tracing of
communications.  The simulator  helps to debug LCS   programs, it also
makes a valuable tool for teaching or learning CCS.

LCS is implemented as a byte code  interpreter; it is reasonnably fast
and  robust. Binaries and core image  files are small, core images are
portable accross machines.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The ftp distribution:

LCS V3.1  is available for Sun3  and Sun4 workstations, under SunOS 4.
It    may   be  obtained  by  ftp  anonymous   on   site  laas.laas.fr
(140.93.0.15), directory /pub/lcs; or by streamer tape, on request.

The ftp distribution is constituted of the following files:

README                  directives for installation
V3-1.tar.Z              libraries, man pages and miscellaneous
doc.tar.Z               users manual and other reports
bin.tar.Z               core image files for all targets
sun3_4.1.1.tar.Z        binaries for SUN3 under SunOS 4.1.1
sun4_4.1.1.tar.Z        binaries for SUN4 under SunOS 4.1.1

Set  binary mode; copy files  README, V3-1.tar.Z, doc.tar.Z, bin.tar.Z
and the binary  file(s)  for your machine(s) and  operating system(s);
install as explained in file README.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The mailing list:

mail:                   for:
lcs-request@laas.fr     registration/deletion to the lcs list
lcs@laas.fr             contributions to the lcs list
lcs-bugs@laas.fr        bug reports
bernard@laas.fr         any other reasons

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:

Bernard Berthomieu
LAAS-CNRS, 7, Avenue du Colonel Roche, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex
e-mail: bernard@laas.fr
phone:  (+33) 61 33 64 08
fax:    (+33) 61 55 35 77

The LCS project is partially supported by CNRS/Greco C-Cube.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <7923@laas.laas.fr>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mcsun!corton!laas!ava!bernard
References: <1992Oct15.090326.11643@topaz.comlab.ox.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!gatech!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!mcsun!corton!laas!ava!bernard
From: bernard@ava.laas.fr (Bernard Berthomieu,28c,6408)
Newsgroups: comp.specification
Subject: Re: Specification v. design languages (was Re: Goals, Cost, and Flexibility)
Message-ID: <7923@laas.laas.fr>
Date: 16 Oct 92 09:19:21 GMT
References: <1992Oct15.090326.11643@topaz.comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Sender: news@laas.fr
Reply-To: bernard@ava.laas.fr
Organization: LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse (France)
Lines: 115
Nntp-Posting-Host: ava