🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.specification
Article #64

Re: formal methods in US

#64
From: Andrew Walduck
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 05:09
51 lines
2901 bytes
In article <4521577@harvee.UUCP>, esj@harvee.UUCP (Eric S Johansson) writes:
|> In article <1992Mar31.164952.18327@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
jon@cs.washington.edu
|> (Jon Jacky) writes:
|> 
|> > In article <1992Mar31.015456.2392@oracorp.com> narayana@oracorp.com
(K. T. Narayana) writes:
|> > > I would appreciate if people cut off this half baked survey of people
|> > > working in formal methods in north america. 
|> > > ...kt
|> > 
|> > In contrast, I would like to say that I have found this interesting
and do 
|> > appreciate seeing it, and would welcome additional contributions.  
It's easy
|> > enough for people to skip over articles that do not interest them.
|> 
|> 
|> I too have found this communication interesting and I have been
|> entertaining thoughts of it degenerating into a comp.specification.aa
|> meeting (my name is eric and I am a coder :-) 
|> 
|> This discussion is dealing (indirectly) with change.  How do I get {
|> myself, my manager, my coworkers, ... } to change to understand and 
|> hopefully use formal methods.  by understanding what we learn, how we
|> learn it and what motavates us to learn formal methods, we can convince
|> others and know what to teach them.  In trying to change my work environment
|> I have encountered indifference, hostility, fear and far too little
|> excitement.  

How do you get people to use assert()  {a form of
pre-conditions/post-conditions}
How do you get people to design instead of hack??
How do you get people to "throw the first 2 away"??
How do you explain to people that code is "written once" ... "maintained
forever"
How do you explain to people that finding bugs is a "good thing"... as it
    means you won't ship them to the customer...
How do you get people to re-use?? Not re-invent??

Nobody likes to be told how to do their job. Or that they could do it better...
or that there is a better way...

This is more of a social problem...a resistance to new ideas...

(the solution to which has been left as an excercise for the student!! ;-)

Andrew Walduck -- OMRON Japan -- andrew@lsa.ncl.omron.co.jp 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Spencer says "Retch barf." 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1411@frf.omron.co.jp>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!sh.wide!astemgw!relay-omron!frf!lsa.ncl.omron.co.jp!andrew
References: <1992Mar29.180106.3876@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> <1992Mar31.015456.2392@oracorp.com> <1992Mar31.164952.18327@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <4521577@harvee.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!sh.wide!astemgw!relay-omron!frf!lsa.ncl.omron.co.jp!andrew
From: andrew@lsa.ncl.omron.co.jp (Andrew Walduck)
Newsgroups: comp.specification
Subject: Re: formal methods in US
Message-ID: <1411@frf.omron.co.jp>
Date: 14 Apr 92 05:09:36 GMT
References: <1992Mar29.180106.3876@gmuvax2.gmu.edu> <1992Mar31.015456.2392@oracorp.com> <1992Mar31.164952.18327@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <4521577@harvee.UUCP>
Sender: news@frf.omron.co.jp
Reply-To: andrew@lsa.ncl.omron.co.jp (Andrew Walduck)
Distribution: comp.specification
Lines: 51