Re: C++ name mangling incompatibilities

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #102

#102

From: Jim ADCOCK
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1992 19:38

5 lines
641 bytes

In article <1992Mar31.193816.23051@borland.com> pete@borland.com (Pete Becker) writes:

*His explanation* for some of the design decisions of the Microsoft compiler.

Which is at best speculative on his part.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr10.193802.25552@microsoft.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!jimad

References: <1992Mar30.170556.5756@borland.com> <CIMSHOP!DAVIDM.92Mar31104817@uunet.UU.NET> <1992Mar31.193816.23051@borland.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim ADCOCK)
Subject: Re: C++ name mangling incompatibilities
Message-ID: <1992Apr10.193802.25552@microsoft.com>
Date: 10 Apr 92 19:38:02 GMT
Organization: Microsoft Corp.
References: <1992Mar30.170556.5756@borland.com> <CIMSHOP!DAVIDM.92Mar31104817@uunet.UU.NET> <1992Mar31.193816.23051@borland.com>
Distribution: comp
Lines: 6

Reply to Parent Message