Re: pointer comparisons

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1187

#1187

From: John MAX Skaller
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 15:52

16 lines
1214 bytes

In article <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com> pkt@lpi.liant.com (Scott Turner) writes:
>	Does it govern base class subobjects?  As I understand it,
>	base class subobjects are objects, and hence are covered.

	One consequence: abstract objects can exist.

	Corollary: such objects have states not accessible via
	the contiguous storage allocated for them.
	(via virtual function calls)


-- 
;----------------------------------------------------------------------
        JOHN (MAX) SKALLER,         maxtal@extro.ucc.su.oz.au
	Maxtal Pty Ltd, 6 MacKay St ASHFIELD, NSW 2131, AUSTRALIA
;--------------- SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING SOFTWARE ------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan1.155241.28217@ucc.su.OZ.AU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU!maxtal

References: <1992Dec27.050118.1628@lpi.liant.com> <1992Dec30.184614.5551@microsoft.com> <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU!maxtal
From: maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller)
Subject: Re: pointer comparisons
Message-ID: <1993Jan1.155241.28217@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
Nntp-Posting-Host: extro.ucc.su.oz.au
Organization: MAXTAL P/L C/- University Computing Centre, Sydney
References: <1992Dec27.050118.1628@lpi.liant.com> <1992Dec30.184614.5551@microsoft.com> <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 15:52:41 GMT
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message