Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1207Name-scope semantic differences between 2.1 and 3.0
From: Mark Rosenberg
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:17
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:17
16 lines
1228 bytes
1228 bytes
How are CFRONT 2.1 name-scoping semantics different from CFRONT 3.0 name-scoping semantics? We are developing a product that needs to be supported on several different platforms (currently RS-6000 and Sparc). This product relies upon Objectstore. According to their support people, their compiler has templates but 2.1 name-scope semantics. Apparently 2.1 name-scope semantics are not a subset of 3.0 name-scope semantics. What are the implications of these semantic differences? What should one do or not do to maximize compatibility? -- Mark Rosenberg internet:mark@delfin.com phone: (408) 562-1126 fax: (408) 748-1140 snail: Delfin Systems, 3000 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054-1814
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec11.181744.7709@delfin.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!utkcs2!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!delfin.com!delfin.com!mrShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ornl!utkcs2!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!delfin.com!delfin.com!mr From: mr@delfin.com (Mark Rosenberg) Subject: Name-scope semantic differences between 2.1 and 3.0 Message-ID: <1992Dec11.181744.7709@delfin.com> Sender: mr@yang (Mark Rosenberg) Nntp-Posting-Host: merlin Reply-To: mark@delfin.com Organization: Delfin Systems, Sunnyvale CA Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 18:17:44 GMT Lines: 16