Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1234Re: Virtual base classes and mem initializers
From: Jim Adcock
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:31
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 21:31
11 lines
895 bytes
895 bytes
In article <1992Dec11.165754.9910@Cadence.COM> cox@cadence.com (Henry Cox) writes: |What I propose, then is that the virtual base class constructor call |be required _only_ at the apex of a multiple-inheritance cone. |Otherwise, the compiler should figure it out, from the base classes, |exactly as for a "normal" base class. | |Comments? Suggestions? 1) Don't use virtual base classes. 2) If you insist on using virtual base classes, use default constructors.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec14.213114.20673@microsoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimadReferences:
<1992Dec11.165754.9910@Cadence.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock) Subject: Re: Virtual base classes and mem initializers Message-ID: <1992Dec14.213114.20673@microsoft.com> Date: 14 Dec 92 21:31:14 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation References: <1992Dec11.165754.9910@Cadence.COM> Keywords: mem initializers, virtual base classes, multiple inheritance Lines: 12