Re: Compiler should generate virtual destructors

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1354

#1354

From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:01

12 lines
993 bytes

In article <harvey.727664973@regina> harvey@opl.com (Harvey Reed) writes:

> I like this! Compilers could have "compatibility" switches, but for 
> those of us who would rather do it ourselves, we could use the
> full strength version.

The trouble with compatibility switches is that they force people
who care about portability to write in the intersection of the language
accepted in the two modes.
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@europa.att.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <24679@alice.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark

References: <1992Dec31.050150.28929@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <lkc2k7INNajv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <harvey.727664973@regina>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: Compiler should generate virtual destructors
Message-ID: <24679@alice.att.com>
Date: 22 Jan 93 13:01:52 GMT
Article-I.D.: alice.24679
References: <1992Dec31.050150.28929@ucc.su.OZ.AU> <lkc2k7INNajv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <harvey.727664973@regina>
Reply-To: ark@alice.UUCP ()
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message