Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1361Re: RESULTS: C++ file extension survey
From: Walter Bright
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:32
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:32
20 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
In article <1993Jan12.153045.15612@cs.brown.edu> sdm@cs.brown.edu (Scott Meyers) writes: /In article <1569@nazgul.UUCP> bright@nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright) writes: /| Zortech C++ will recognize .cpp, .cxx, .cc and .c++ all as valid C++ /| filename extensions, though our examples all use .cpp. /I have never been able to fathom why any compiler *cares* what file /extension is used. Because the driver program recognizes ASM, OBJ, C, C++, EXE, COM, LIB, DEF files, etc., and tries to do the obvious thing with it. For instance, if a .EXE file name is given, the driver assumes that is the name of the output file wanted. Also, the driver tries on various extensions if the user didn't type in one. This can be a nice convenience. If all else fails, the driver assumes it is a C++ or C program, depending on if the -cpp is used or not. As to whether a #include file is .h or .hpp or whatever, makes absolutely *no* difference to the driver.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1589@nazgul.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pilchuck!fnx!nazgul!brightReferences:
<1if5q2INN8pj@tsavo.hks.com> <1993Jan7.182757.8297@wam.umd.edu> <1569@nazgul.UUCP> <1993Jan12.153045.15612@cs.brown.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pilchuck!fnx!nazgul!bright From: bright@nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: RESULTS: C++ file extension survey Message-ID: <1589@nazgul.UUCP> Date: 24 Jan 93 05:32:37 GMT References: <1if5q2INN8pj@tsavo.hks.com> <1993Jan7.182757.8297@wam.umd.edu> <1569@nazgul.UUCP> <1993Jan12.153045.15612@cs.brown.edu> Reply-To: bright@nazgul.UUCP (Walter Bright) Organization: Zortech, Seattle Lines: 20