Re: virtual destructors by default

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1391

#1391

From: Harvey Reed
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:38

15 lines
843 bytes

ark@alice.att.com (Andrew Koenig) writes:

>For these reasons, I am dubious about the proposal.  I do think, though,
>that it is wise for compilers to issue warning messages for classes
>with virtual functions that do not also have virtual destructors.

I agree. Tis better for compilers to make the programmer more aware,
than to do too much automatically.


-- 
++harvey
========================================================================
internet:  harvey@opl.com  /  hreed@cs.ulowell.edu  /  h.reed@ieee.org
voice:     617-965-0220

Technical Details

Message-ID: <harvey.726176339@regina>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!opl.com!regina!harvey

References: <24544@alice.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!opl.com!regina!harvey
From: harvey@opl.com (Harvey Reed)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: virtual destructors by default
Message-ID: <harvey.726176339@regina>
Date: 4 Jan 93 19:38:59 GMT
References: <24544@alice.att.com>
Sender: news@opl.com
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message