Re: pointer comparisons

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1407

#1407

From: John MAX Skaller
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 17:51

20 lines
1547 bytes

In article <1993Jan5.203237.28304@lpi.liant.com> pkt@lpi.liant.com (Scott Turner) writes:
>
>Which is where I wish to leave the issue, willing to trust for the present
>that objects which I wish distinct will be distinct.  This trust rests on
>
>      1. The status of distinct objects as objects.
>
>      2. The guarantee of 1.3 that an object occupies at least 1 byte
>         of storage.

	What does 1.3 say? (I do not have the WP, only the ARM.
The ARM appears to guarrantee ONLY that operator new() must
yield distinct addresses, it says nothing about subobjects
or included objects that I can find. Have I missed something?)

-- 
;----------------------------------------------------------------------
        JOHN (MAX) SKALLER,         maxtal@extro.ucc.su.oz.au
	Maxtal Pty Ltd, 6 MacKay St ASHFIELD, NSW 2131, AUSTRALIA
;--------------- SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING SOFTWARE ------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1993Jan6.175124.613@ucc.su.OZ.AU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU!maxtal

References: <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com> <1993Jan05.003819.12515@microsoft.com> <1993Jan5.203237.28304@lpi.liant.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!metro!extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU!maxtal
From: maxtal@extro.ucc.su.OZ.AU (John MAX Skaller)
Subject: Re: pointer comparisons
Message-ID: <1993Jan6.175124.613@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
Nntp-Posting-Host: extro.ucc.su.oz.au
Organization: MAXTAL P/L C/- University Computing Centre, Sydney
References: <1992Dec31.170223.21637@lpi.liant.com> <1993Jan05.003819.12515@microsoft.com> <1993Jan5.203237.28304@lpi.liant.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 17:51:24 GMT
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message