🚀 go-pugleaf

clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage) writes:
...
> For months, I and others begged in this forum and by private email for information
> about C+@: what exactly is it, where can we get a language specification,
> what implementations exist, how can we get an implementation, and so on.
...
> So Jim, I'm saying again, "Put up or shut up." It appears that C+@ is no
> more than a figment of your very fertile imagination. Prove me wrong, or
> stop mentioning it in this forum, which is, after all, supposed to be
> about C++.

Sorry, but he has at one time or another (in at least one out of very
many postings) provided such a path, because I followed it sometime
long ago and retrieved a 58-page document titled:

  "The C+@ Pr ogramming Language:
       Language Definition"

by:

  Software Infrastructure Group
   AT&T Bell Laboratories
   Naperville, IL 60566

This document was apparently produced in 1990.  I think that this
language was once known as "Calico", though I'm not sure.

speaking for myself,

David Chase