Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1564Re: STL operators != > <= >=
From: Joe Borkoles
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 14:51
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 1995 14:51
17 lines
1191 bytes
1191 bytes
mfinney@inmind.com wrote: >In the 28 April 1995 Draft Standard (which I was only able to download last week) >section 20.2.1 says that the STL portion of the Standard Library will define >operator!=(), operator>(), operator<=() and operator>=() in terms of operator=() >and operator<(). > >This breaks my code! And NOT in a fixable fashion! > I too have been finding these operators quite annoying and forcing me to reorder my header files in a most unpleasant fashion. I have had some discussion with colleagues and we thought that breaking up the standard library into hierarchical namespaces might be the way to go. ----------------------------------- I speak for myself and no one else.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3vqnqf$kst@hardcopy.ny.jpmorgan.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!jpmorgan.com!usenetReferences:
<3vpmv5$4t7@mujibur.inmind.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!jpmorgan.com!usenet From: Joe Borkoles <jborkole@jpmorgan.com> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: STL operators != > <= >= Date: 3 Aug 1995 14:51:59 GMT Organization: J.P. Morgan Message-ID: <3vqnqf$kst@hardcopy.ny.jpmorgan.com> References: <3vpmv5$4t7@mujibur.inmind.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gd-doac40.uk.jpmorgan.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit)