Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1638Re: Operator new Question
From: J. Kanze
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 12:35
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 12:35
22 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
Steve Clamage (clamage@Eng.Sun.COM) wrote:
|> The results of using "delete" on a pointer value obtained from a placement-
|> new are undefined. Any result is allowed. It is invalid C++, but no
|> diagnostic is required.
Can this be true? I always thought that the results of using delete
were to call the destructors, and then call operator delete(). If the
memory was not obtained by calling operator new( size_t ), then the
results are undefined, but in the example given, the memory was obtained
by the placement new calling operator new( size_t ).
Does this mean that I cannot delete memory obtained by:
p = new ( nothrow() ) T ;
This would sort of make this version of new useless.
--
James Kanze (+33) 88 14 49 00 email: kanze@gabi-soft.fr
GABI Software, Sarl., 8 rue des Francs Bourgeois, 67000 Strasbourg, France
Conseils en informatique industrielle--
--Beratung in industrieller Datenverarbeitung
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4051al$2i8@gabi.gabi-soft.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gabi-soft.fr!not-for-mailReferences:
<3vu2gv$kav@bmtlh10.bnr.ca> <3vu7te$ql4@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gabi-soft.fr!not-for-mail From: kanze@gabi-soft.fr (J. Kanze) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Operator new Question Date: 7 Aug 1995 14:35:33 +0200 Organization: GABI Software, Sarl. Message-ID: <4051al$2i8@gabi.gabi-soft.fr> References: <3vu2gv$kav@bmtlh10.bnr.ca> <3vu7te$ql4@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> NNTP-Posting-Host: gabi.gabi-soft.fr X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]