🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3v36qp$3n6@metro.ucc.su.OZ.AU>, maxtal@Physics.usyd.edu.au (John Max Skaller) says:
>
>In article <3u1jtg$cag@keystone.intergate.net>,
>Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey@proteus-tech.com> wrote:
>>
>>//  destroy() and construct() have to be explicitly defined here as
>>//  the pointer types do not template well for user-defined classes.
>>//
>>//  Is there any way around this?!?!?

>        No. It is only a problem because compilers do not yet
>correctly implement

>        template<class T> void destroy(T *t) {
>                t->~T(); // stuffs up many compilers

YES,there is a way around this, and it's called STL<ToolKit>. This is
the ObjectSpace implementation of STL, and it contains workarounds for
pretty much all of the major compiler limitations. For more information
send email to info@objectspace.com. STL<ToolKit> includes a set of
cross-platform thread & synchronization classes for multi-thread STL
development, as well as a set of helper algorithms that make STL easier
to use.

- Graham