Re: STL operators != > <= >=

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1689

#1689

From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 1995 13:06

11 lines
774 bytes

In article <409bjt$59c@mujibur.inmind.com> mfinney@inmind.com writes:

> >Another overhead is to wait for a compiler which implements namespaces :-).

> The main problem is that far too much code will require a "using namespace std;"
> along with my class libraries -- and then we get the conflict again.

Why do you think so?
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@research.att.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DD1oF2.AA1@research.att.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!allegra!alice!ark

References: <4065oq$3f4@mujibur.inmind.com> <407n9d$nb7@lyman.pppl.gov> <409bjt$59c@mujibur.inmind.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!allegra!alice!ark
From: ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Subject: Re: STL operators != > <= >=
Message-ID: <DD1oF2.AA1@research.att.com>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ
References: <4065oq$3f4@mujibur.inmind.com> <407n9d$nb7@lyman.pppl.gov> <409bjt$59c@mujibur.inmind.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 13:06:38 GMT

Reply to Parent Message