🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <40ak2i$9oa@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> clamage@Eng.Sun.COM writes:
| It is covered. There is no syntax for getting an overloaded operator delete
| via a delete-expression. You can define a "placement delete", but it is
| called only if
|  - a constructor invoked from a placement-new expression exits via an exception, or
|  - you call the operator delete explicitly.
| That is:
| 	T* p ...
| 	delete p; // never calls a placement delete
| 	// but you can do this
| 	p->~T(); // call destructor
| 	operator delete(p, &allocator);

Okay, what am I missing?  DWP 3.7.3.2 says that if operator delete has a
second parameter, it must be of type size_t.  How can &allocator be of that
type? 

Scott