Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1698Re: STL operators != > <= >=
From: mfinney
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 02:41
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 02:41
10 lines
1082 bytes
1082 bytes
In <40ba9d$5ij@lyman.pppl.gov>, Etay Bogner <Etay_Bogner@mail.stil.scitex.com> writes: >The problem might be the overloading rules BETWEEN namespaces. Its true, that the definition conflict will not occur unless both namespaces have a local using as in your example. But, this is a case where (in my opinion) the standard should NOT have a definition that conflicts when the definition in STL is mathematically incorrect for classes which are not linearly ordered. Michael Lee Finney
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40brjt$343@mujibur.inmind.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mujibur.inmind.com!usenetReferences:
<3vpmv5$4t7@mujibur.inmind.com> <3vpnrq$50c@mujibur.inmind.com> <MATT.95Aug7100148@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> <4065oq$3f4@mujibur.inmind.com> <407n9d$nb7@lyman.pppl.gov> <409bjt$59c@mujibur.inmind.com> <40ba9d$5ij@lyman.pppl.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mujibur.inmind.com!usenet From: mfinney@inmind.com Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: STL operators != > <= >= Date: 10 Aug 1995 02:41:01 GMT Organization: In Mind, Inc. Message-ID: <40brjt$343@mujibur.inmind.com> References: <3vpmv5$4t7@mujibur.inmind.com> <3vpnrq$50c@mujibur.inmind.com> <MATT.95Aug7100148@godzilla.EECS.Berkeley.EDU> <4065oq$3f4@mujibur.inmind.com> <407n9d$nb7@lyman.pppl.gov> <409bjt$59c@mujibur.inmind.com> <40ba9d$5ij@lyman.pppl.gov> Reply-To: mfinney@inmind.com NNTP-Posting-Host: finneyman.inmind.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2