🚀 go-pugleaf

mfinney@inmind.com wrote:

>Its true, that the definition conflict will not occur unless both namespaces have a
>local using as in your example.  But, this is a case where (in my opinion) the

>Michael Lee Finney

My point is that the "search for function" rulesshould change. The local "using" is almost mandatory since, 
I guess, no one wants to use qualification for each function. 

Its trivial that the "conflict will not occur unless both namespaces have a local using". I'm saying that 
its also trivial to solve the ambiguity.

The example again :

namespace N1 {
	void f();
	void g();
	};

namespace N2 {
	void f();
	};

using namespace N1;
using namespace N2;

void N1::g() {
	f(); // The standard says this is ambiguous. it should call N1::f()
	}

-- Etay Bogner,
-- Etay_Bogner@mail.stil.scitex.com,
-- Scitex Corp.
-- Israel.