🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1740

true/false literal std question

#1740
From: mfinney
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 16:50
13 lines
1242 bytes
The draft standard introduces two new reserved identifiers -- "true" and "false"
(among others, of course).  These play the role of literals for the new bool type.

My question, is: are these new literals supported by the preprocessor?  The new
bool type is designed to replace the many variants of "boolean", "true" and
"false" found everywhere.  However many, if not most, of the existing
definitions can be used in preprocessor expressions.  If it is NOT possible to use
the new true/false literals in preprocessor expressions then they will have to
be duplicated just for preprocessing -- obviously not desirable.

Does anyone know the answer to this question?  Thanks.

Michael Lee Finney
Technical Details
Message-ID: <40jjuu$qnk@mujibur.inmind.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.mu.OZ.AU!bounce-back

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!cs.mu.OZ.AU!bounce-back
From: mfinney@inmind.com
Subject: true/false literal std question
Status: RO
Message-ID: <40jjuu$qnk@mujibur.inmind.com>
To: comp-std-c++@uunet.uu.net
Originator: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU
Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU (CS-Usenet)
Reply-To: mfinney@inmind.com
Organization: In Mind, Inc.
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2
X-Original-Date: 13 Aug 1995 01: 19:26 GMT
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 16:50:17 GMT
Return-Path: <daemon@ncar.UCAR.EDU>
Approved: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU