🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <41bf4j$d70@larry.rice.edu>, dougm@rice.edu (Doug Moore) writes:

> While I agree that it is a common and basically pointless question, I
> can't believe that a message which is nothing but a flame made it past
> moderation.

This is probably pointless as well, but a detailed rationale (which, last
I heard, was not in the plans for C++) could answer these questions as
well.  Is there a rationale for why there is no rationale?

speaking for myself,

David Chase
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]