Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1821Re: Why no logical XOR operator?
From: Andrew Koenig
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 02:07
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 02:07
14 lines
1103 bytes
1103 bytes
In article <9508221614.AA14724@vajra> David Chase <chase@centerline.com> writes: > This is probably pointless as well, but a detailed rationale (which, last > I heard, was not in the plans for C++) could answer these questions as > well. Is there a rationale for why there is no rationale? No ... just a lack of volunteers to write it. -- --Andrew Koenig ark@research.att.com [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DDqMM9.43H@research.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamageReferences:
<9508221614.AA14724@vajra>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage From: ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Why no logical XOR operator? Date: 23 Aug 1995 02:07:18 GMT Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill NJ Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++) Message-ID: <DDqMM9.43H@research.att.com> References: <9508221614.AA14724@vajra> NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com Content-Type: text Content-Length: 390 Originator: clamage@taumet