🚀 go-pugleaf

Distribution:
In article 95Aug24221434@Austern, Tony Cook <tony@online.tmx.com.au> writes:
>
>Is there a specific reason that a nested class cannot have a member
>template?
>
>My main query is why the specific restriction exists.

I didn't find that restriction in the draft, but I may have missed it.

There is a restriction that a *local* class cannot have a member template.
(A local class is one defined inside a function.) You cannot declare a
template inside a function, so it seems reasonable to disallow template
members of local classes for the same reason.

---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com




---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]