🚀 go-pugleaf

Distribution:
In article <41kf36$1ut@gabi.gabi-soft.fr>, J. Kanze <kanze@gabi-soft.fr> wrote:
> Nathan Myers (ncm@netcom.com) wrote:
> |> ...  <iostream.h> will be a universally-implemented vendor
> |> extension, implemented with semantics equivalent to above.
> 
> We hope:-).
> 
> What about the MS-DOS based machines?  Last time I looked, they didn't
> have iostream.h, but iostream.hpp.  (At least, that is what Zorland had;
> when I last looked, they were the only C++ compiler available under
> MS-DOS:-).)

My apologies, again.  <iostream.h>, or <iostream.hpp>, or <iostream.h++>,
or <iostream.H>, or <iostream.hxx>, or <iostream.hh>, will be a
universally-implemented extension.  Which name is chosen will of
course be up to the vendor.  For portability, code to the standard.

"Zorland"?  :-)

Nathan Myers
myersn@roguewave.com


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]