Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #1913Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);?
From: Steve Clamage
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 15:47
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 1995 15:47
22 lines
1221 bytes
1221 bytes
In article lvf@citadel.evolving.com, tblancha@evolving.com (Todd Blanchard) writes: > >Designers could try telling the truth once in awhile and say something like: >"Nobody thought of it early enough and its too late to change now." >Which I suspect is more likely. Except in this case, the approach had been discussed years ago and rejected as not a good idea. See D&E, for example. I recommend that you do a minimum of research before accusing others of laziness and mendacity. --- Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MATT.95Sep5084741@physics2.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!mattReferences:
<42fp2l$lvf@citadel.evolving.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt From: clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Why not op delete(void* v&,size_t);? Date: 05 Sep 1995 15:47:41 GMT Organization: Sun Microsystems Inc. Approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern) Message-ID: <MATT.95Sep5084741@physics2.Berkeley.EDU> References: <42fp2l$lvf@citadel.evolving.com> Reply-To: clamage@Eng.Sun.COM NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu