Re: STL is Standard C++ Library? I don't think so.

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #1954

#1954

From: John Max Skaller
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 17:18

24 lines
1309 bytes

clamage@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Clamage) wrote:
>
>STL is in the Draft Standard. No one** on the C++ committee wants to
>remove STL, and so far no ISO national body has asked for
>STL to be removed, so it is virtually certain it will remain.
>
>(** as far as I know)

  On the other hand several National Bodies are almost
certain to reject the Standard if STL is _removed_.

-- 
John Max Skaller               voice: 61-2-566-2189
81 Glebe Point Rd              fax:   61-2-660-0850
GLEBE NSW 2037                 email: maxtal@suphys.physics.oz.au
AUSTRALIA                      email: skaller@maxtal.com.au



---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <MATT.95Sep12101843@physics2.Berkeley.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt

References: <432hpp$9p1@aladdin.iii.org.tw> <432p70$f1d@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt
From: John Max Skaller <maxtal@suphys.physics.su.oz.au>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: STL is Standard C++ Library? I don't think so.
Date: 12 Sep 1995 17:18:43 GMT
Organization: MAXTAL
Approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern)
Message-ID: <MATT.95Sep12101843@physics2.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <432hpp$9p1@aladdin.iii.org.tw> <432p70$f1d@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu

Reply to Parent Message