🚀 go-pugleaf

A while ago, Steve Clamage kindly pointed out to me that partial
template specializations where allowed by the draft standard.

Thus for a template

	template<class T, int n> class X { ... };

it should be possible to explicitly specify a variant for, say,

	class X<class T, 1> { ... };

where T is still a "free" formal parameter. 
Although I know that most compiler don't support this feature yet,
I'am curious about the syntax of such a partial specialization
(I don't think the above example is correct).
Is anybody able to figure that out of the standard document?

Regards,
 
             Martin Hitz
					
Applied Computer Science &       |  Email:     Martin.Hitz@univie.ac.at
Information Systems              |  URL:       http://www.pri.univie.ac.at
University of Vienna             |  Phone:     +43-1-40103-2795	
Rathausstrasse 19/4              |  Secretary: +43-1-40103-2792
A-1010 Vienna (Austria, Europe)  |  Fax:       +43-1-4066712


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]