🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 95Sep15152129@physics2.Berkeley.EDU, Martin Hitz <hitz@ftp.univie.ac.at> writes:
>
>A while ago, Steve Clamage kindly pointed out to me that partial
>template specializations where allowed by the draft standard.
>
>Thus for a template
>
>	template<class T, int n> class X { ... };
>
>it should be possible to explicitly specify a variant for, say,
>
>	class X<class T, 1> { ... };
>
>where T is still a "free" formal parameter. 
>Although I know that most compiler don't support this feature yet,
>I'am curious about the syntax of such a partial specialization
>(I don't think the above example is correct).

According to the way I read 14.6, class template specialization, [temp.class.spec]
you would write
	template<class T> class X<T, 1> { ... }


---
Steve Clamage, stephen.clamage@eng.sun.com



---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]