🚀 go-pugleaf

rmartin@rcmcon.com (Robert Martin) writes:
> That thread also suggested that the only way to explicitly call placement
> delete would be to overtly call the appropriate operator delete.  e.g.
> 
> 	operator delete (object, arg1, arg2);

In fact, wouldn't you have to call `operator delete' with the address of the
most derived subclass object?  How would you do that?

> Now, as I understand it, such a call will not cause the destructor of the
> object to be called.  Thus, of one is to invoke the placement syntax of
> operator delete, one must first explicitly call the destructor.
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]