🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <FENSTER.95Sep18204129@shadow.cs.columbia.edu>,
fenster@cs.columbia.edu (Sam Fenster) wrote:
> rmartin@rcmcon.com (Robert Martin) writes:
> > That thread also suggested that the only way to explicitly call placement
> > delete would be to overtly call the appropriate operator delete.  e.g.
> > 
> >       operator delete (object, arg1, arg2);
> 
> In fact, wouldn't you have to call `operator delete' with the address of the
> most derived subclass object?  How would you do that?

     operator delete (dynamic_cast<void*>(object), arg1, arg2);

-- 
Bill Gibbons
bgibbons@taligent.com


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]