Re: "packed" objects

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #206

#206

From: John Baldwin
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 1990 18:47

19 lines
1352 bytes

In article <56165@microsoft.UUCP> jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) writes:
>Proposed:
>We need a way to "pack" objects over inheritence boundaries, and possibly
>between labeled fields of a declaration.
>...[excerpted]....

>* Require current field ordering restrictions be maintained on things declared
>  "struct", but removed restrictions on anything declared "class."

Personally, I like this option best.  On an entirely subjective level, it is
in keeping with the philosophy of C++ being "extended/better C", and it would
minimize confusion when switching often between writing C and C++.

[disclaimer: just another user's comments on the first user's suggestion.]
-- 
John T. Baldwin                      |  johnb@srchtec.uucp
Search Technology, Inc.              |  johnb%srchtec.uucp@mathcs.emory.edu
standard disclaimer:                 |  ...uunet!samsung!emory!stiatl!srchtec..
opinions and mistakes purely my own. |  ...mailrus!gatech!stiatl!srchtec...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <159@srchtec.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!emory!stiatl!srchtec!johnb

References: <56159@microsoft.UUCP> <56165@microsoft.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!emory!stiatl!srchtec!johnb
From: johnb@srchtec.UUCP (John Baldwin)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: "packed" objects
Message-ID: <159@srchtec.UUCP>
Date: 31 Jul 90 18:47:42 GMT
References: <56159@microsoft.UUCP> <56165@microsoft.UUCP>
Organization: search technology, inc.
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message