🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <AKV.95Sep29014218@srl03.cacs.usl.edu> akv@cacs.usl.edu writes:

> Check out the third declaration of function "f". Is that supposed to
> be an error -- I mean the comment?

>   13.1  Overloadable declarations                            [over.load]
>   ....
>  --Two parameter declarations that differ only in their  default  argu-
>     ments are equivalent.  [Example: consider the following:
>               void f (int i, int j);
>               void f (int i, int j = 99);         // Ok: redeclaration of f (int, int)
>               void f (int i = 88);                // Ok: redeclaration of f (int, int)
>               void f ();                          // Ok: overloaded declaration of f

It's a typo: the line

		void f (int i = 88);

should read

		void f (int i = 88, j);
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@research.att.com


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]