🚀 go-pugleaf

I got the implementation of auto_ptr in the draft standard

- Is there a reason why the method operator=(T*) isn't
  implemented.
- Why operator= doesn't respect the classical sementic of
  this operator, returning T* to enable: p1 = p2 = p3;
- With this implementation it's not possible to build auto_ptr
  on const T*, because constructor takes a T* as argument.
  
jlm

ps: Could somebody give me pointers to good publications
    on "all about reference counting and smart pointers"
--
+----------------------------+------------------------------------+
|   Jean-Louis Moser         |    2001 SA                         |
|   tel: 33 (1)46.66.54.54   |    2, rue de la renaissance        |
|   Email: jlm@two-oo-one.fr |    F-92184 Antony Cedex            |
+----------------------------+------------------------------------+

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]