Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2180Re: STL <iostream> vs. <iostream.h>
From: James M. Curran
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 08:42
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 08:42
17 lines
1129 bytes
1129 bytes
Distribution: >> But, of course, every one of those existing programs is >> non-standard. Since we as yet have no standard, every one of _ALL_ existing programs are non-standard. [Moderator's note: I think that "non-standard" in the original post is simply shorthand for "non-standard under the assumption that there will be no major changes to the rules in the current draft." Still, it's worth remembering that the draft isn't a standard. mha] --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<45jn68$cj6$2@mhafm.production.compuserve.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate!MattReferences:
<r4vipxr113.fsf@erawan.cognex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate!Matt From: "James M. Curran" <72261.655@CompuServe.COM> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: STL <iostream> vs. <iostream.h> Date: 14 Oct 1995 08:42:45 GMT Organization: CompuServe, Inc. (1-800-689-0736) Approved: Matt@Austern Message-ID: <45jn68$cj6$2@mhafm.production.compuserve.com> References: <r4vipxr113.fsf@erawan.cognex.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: austern.hip.berkeley.edu