🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DGo62s.FxK@kithrup.com>, Mike Stump  <mrs@cygnus.com> wrote:
>
>In article <45uf98$dqt@jabba.lehman.com>, Ajay Kamdar <ajay@lehman.com> wrote:
>>>[Moderator's note: Another WWW site with the draft standard is 
>>>http://www.cygnus.com/~mrs/wp-draft.  mha]
>>
>>That URL refers to the April Working Paper -- not the latest draft.
>
>Wrong.  It does reference the latest ANSI Draft for C++.  The other,
>is just a working paper, it is not an ANSI draft, nor has it even been
>approved by the committee.

I am sure you are right, but take a look at the April "Draft". It still
has a title in bold letters proclaiming it to be the "April Working Paper",
with following text that reads "The Working Paper ..." leading to
the confusion.

Thanks for setting the matter straight.

>>    http://www.cygnus.com/~mrs/wp-oct95/index.html
>
>As you'll find out, it is not the October papper, it is the September
>working paper.

BTW, the URL I referenced above (wp-oct95) doesn't seem to exist anymore.
The new URL for the September working paper is:

    http://www.cygnus.com/~mrs/wp-sep95/index.html


-- 
Ajay Kamdar        |    Email: ajay@lehman.com    |    Standard Disclaimer 
Lehman Brothers    |    Phone: (201) 524-5048     |

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]