🚀 go-pugleaf

I wonder if anyone has a copy of C++ standard could e-mail me a copy of it.  I have tried couple web site such as research.att.com/dist/c++std/wp and ftp/maths.warwick.ac.uk/c++/std/wp but none of those are accessable.  Please e-mail me a copy or let me know if other web site obtain one.  Thanks in advance.


Peter Lee
PLEE@HEART.COM


From daemon@ncar.UCAR.EDU Wed Oct 25 22:59 PDT 1995
Return-Path: <daemon@ncar.UCAR.EDU>
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1) by pacific.eng.sun.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA21099; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:59:05 -0700
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.EBay.Sun.COM) by Eng.Sun.COM (5.x/SMI-5.3)
	id AA26955; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:58:47 -0700
Received: from ncar.UCAR.EDU by mercury.Sun.COM (Sun.COM)
	id WAA27828; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 22:58:46 -0700
Received: by ncar.ucar.EDU (NCAR Local/ NCAR Central Post Office 03/11/93)
	id XAA03421; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:58:43 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from relay-2.mail.demon.net by ncar.ucar.EDU (NCAR Local/ NCAR Central Post Office 03/11/93)
	id XAA03418; Wed, 25 Oct 1995 23:58:37 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from post.demon.co.uk by relay-2.mail.demon.net id af22419;
          26 Oct 95 5:19 GMT
Received: from relay-2.mail.demon.net by relay-3.mail.demon.net id aa13892;
          26 Oct 95 4:55 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 95 03:37:28 GMT
Message-Id: <6037@thone.demon.co.uk>
From: Andy Sawyer <andys@thone.demon.co.uk>
Organization: The United Federation Of Planets
Reply-To: andys@thone.demon.co.uk
To: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
Subject: diagnostic exceptions
X-Mailer: Demon Internet Simple News v1.29
Lines: 33
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1313
X-Lines: 33
Status: RO

In article <ACB2F42C9668BCA1@sleipner.nts.mh.se>
           lars.farm@nts.mh.se "Lars Farm" writes:

 > 
 > The diagnostic exception classes are constructed from a const string&.
 > Will they copy the text or store a reference to the string?
 > 
[snip]

 I have a slightly different thought on this .. why do the constructors
require a string& instead of a const char * ? (The whole thing is further
obfuscated by the base exception class not having a constructor which takes
the const string& parameter).

IMHO, it would be highly desireable if the base class had such a
constructor (perhaps protected) which takes such a parameter. I am keen to
see this in the standard, since it is the obvious implementation...which
I expect most vendors to follow, but if it is not standardized, then there
will always be someone who doesn't.

(I am thinking here primarily of user-defined exception classes, which
derive from exception, but not from logic_error or runtime_error)

Thoughts, anyone?

Regards,
 Andy

-- 
* Andy Sawyer ** e-mail:andys@thone.demon.co.uk ** Compu$erve:100432,1713 **
 The opinions expressed above are my own, but you are granted the right to
 use and freely distribute them. I accept no responsibility for any injury,
 harm or damage arising from their use.                --   The Management.

[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]