Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2346[Q] Merging identical functions
From: bnr (n.) postmaster
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 21:59
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 21:59
18 lines
1329 bytes
1329 bytes
I'm running into problems because a package I use under C++ defines
the same "inline void* operator new(size_t, void* p) { return p; }" as
the STL does.
Is there anything in the C++ standard that will allow identical
definitions such as this to be merged? It seems that, especially with
the above case, such conflicts are likely to be common.
Brian
( bcwhite@bnr.ca )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy
is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<470tgs$it6@engnews1.eng.sun.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!taumet.Eng.Sun.COM!clamageShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!taumet.Eng.Sun.COM!clamage From: "bnr (n.) postmaster" <postmast@bnr.ca> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: [Q] Merging identical functions Date: 29 Oct 1995 21:59:56 GMT Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd. Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++) Message-ID: <470tgs$it6@engnews1.eng.sun.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com Content-Type: text X-Nntp-Posting-Host: bcarsd26.bnr.ca Content-Length: 602 X-Lines: 14 Originator: clamage@taumet.Eng.Sun.COM