class member: static name const; Legal?

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #2356

#2356

From: Bret Pehrson
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 02:41

20 lines
1113 bytes

Is the following legal?

class base
{
  static funkie(void) const;
};

I spend 20 minutes reading the grammar and could not figure it out.  In any 
case, my compiler complains if I mix static and const for the same member 
function.

I presume that it is legal and my compiler is crap, however I would rather hear
 
that from a C++ language expert.

Tnx.
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4733v8$278@stellar.comnet.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in2.uu.net!bounce-back

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in2.uu.net!bounce-back
Date: 31 Oct 95 02:41:32 GMT
Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
From: Bret Pehrson <BretP@strata3d.com>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: class member: static name const;  Legal?
X-Original-Date: 30 Oct 1995 18:02:15 GMT
Organization: STRATA, Inc.
Message-ID: <4733v8$278@stellar.comnet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.22 (Windows; I; 32bit)
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
 iQBFAgUBMJWM6+EDnX0m9pzZAQFqfQF8C/QKdE+1HhT+jmkuCd3FsLw+d4tVC0CM
 nWRGQruH8ggoF9+34riRVxzfmTRUa1yY
 =EEXL