Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2373auto_ptr<T> as function return type
From: ian (i.) willmott
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 21:25
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 21:25
24 lines
1429 bytes
1429 bytes
Some recent comments in this newsgroup indicate that there is some problem with returning an auto_ptr from a function. I was not aware of this; the April 1995 working paper does not mention it and it is not obvious to me why there should be a problem other than the overhead of constructing and destroying a temporary object. Could somebody better informed than I am explain what the issue is? My apologies if this has been discussed before; I missed it. Also, could somebody post the procedure for submitting comments on the draft standard? I sent email to 'c++std-notify@research.att.com' in July and got back a receipt acknowledgement, but nothing else ever came. Again, I expect that this has been posted before, but I didn't see it. Thanks. Ian Willmott Bell-Northern Research Ottawa, Canada (613)-763-9688 willmott@bnr.ca --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47616o$lvr@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!mattShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt From: "ian (i.) willmott" <willmott@bnr.ca> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: auto_ptr<T> as function return type Date: 31 Oct 1995 21:25:28 GMT Organization: Bell Northern Research Approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern) Message-ID: <47616o$lvr@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu