🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <46kdsh$b1v@oznet07.ozemail.com.au>
           maxtal@suphys.physics.su.oz.au "John Max Skaller" writes:

>    You are correct. This IS the case in ISO C. It also IS
> the case in C++ now. In particular the declarations:
> 
>    void f(int);
>    void f(int const);
>    void f(const int);
> 
> declare the same function.
>    
>     I voted in favour of the change to the ARM to bring
> C++ into line with ISO C so I guess I think it
> is a good idea. :-)

Sorry, it didn't compile (3 different compilers) and when I checked ARM...

I know I should look in the draft standard (but the copy to hand is in
Acrobat and slow to use).

-- 
Alan Griffiths               | Also editor of: The ISDF Newsletter
Senior Systems Consultant,   | (An Association of C and C++ Users publication)
CCN Group Limited.           | (ISDF editor  : isdf@octopull.demon.co.uk)
(agriffiths@ma.ccngroup.com) | (For ACCU see : http://bach.cis.temple.edu/accu)

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]