🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1995Oct31.171443.3987@oma.com>, rmartin@oma.com (Robert Martin) writes:
>If the rules allowed virtual deployment in constructors or
>destructors, then functions could be called in classes where the
>members and/or bases had not been initialized, or had been destructed.
>And this, IMHO, would be untennable.

Mr. Martin,
  This would not be "untennable" if the derived class functions that
could be called were limited to static member functions, as Mr. Winroth
proposed.  I would appreciate your insights into this matter once you
have taken that detail into account.  Thank you.

Bill Law
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]