🚀 go-pugleaf

law@solution-frameworks.com wrote:
>Mr. Kanze,
>  Please note that when subject to the limitation of being "static virtual"
>functions, as Mr. Winroth alluded to in his posting to which Mr. Martin was
>replying, "these functions" would not have any way of calling (non-static) 
>member functions, everyday ones or otherwise, and therefore couldn't call
>them "on raw memory."  I am interested in what your thoughts on this topic
>might be in light of this additional information.  Thank you.

If you restrict yourself to "static virtual" functions, you are restricted
to not calling any functions at all.  The construct is an oxymoron.
 
>
>Bill Law

marco
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]