Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2436Re: Why allow virtual function calls in constr
From: law
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 1995 10:49
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 1995 10:49
16 lines
1546 bytes
1546 bytes
In <47e529$ha8@news.vcd.hp.com>, Marco Dalla Gasperina <Marco_Dalla-Gasperina@HP-Vancouver-om1.om.hp.com> writes: >If you restrict yourself to "static virtual" functions, you are restricted >to not calling any functions at all. The construct is an oxymoron. We're talking about the C++ standard here, so the whole thing is a figment of your imagination. Imagine "static virtual" functions, if you can. They're no more oxymoronic than, say, member function templates. Surely you're not suggesting the concept is self-contradictory? Bill --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47kn6r$ca4@shellx.best.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-backReferences:
<HARALD.95Oct30103929@moon.bion.kth.se> <1995Oct31.171443.3987@oma.com> <9511021143.AA01851@slsv7xt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <47crlv$139@shellx.best.com> <47e529$ha8@news.vcd.hp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-back Date: 06 Nov 95 10:49:24 GMT Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au From: law@solution-frameworks.com Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Why allow virtual function calls in constr X-Original-Date: 6 Nov 1995 10:14:51 GMT Organization: Solution Frameworks, San Jose CA Message-ID: <47kn6r$ca4@shellx.best.com> References: <HARALD.95Oct30103929@moon.bion.kth.se> <1995Oct31.171443.3987@oma.com> <9511021143.AA01851@slsv7xt.lts.sel.alcatel.de> <47crlv$139@shellx.best.com> <47e529$ha8@news.vcd.hp.com> Reply-To: law@solution-frameworks.com (Bill Law) X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2 X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUBMJ3oRuEDnX0m9pzZAQEjRgF8CYZDJlh2caZqc2qFkat88CyQwwKhUXPr COHVZemE36iIsj9Ol5Vao+Dc3SDriYsG =TRgM