Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2488An Extra Virtual Destructor Question to Ponder
From: john (j.d.) hickin
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 19:27
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 19:27
18 lines
965 bytes
965 bytes
Now that the standard has carefully specified what virtual functions run when
called from constructors/destructors in objects with multiple inheritance it
becomes possible to allow the following:
class X { public: X(); virtual ~X() = 0; };
Has this been considered?
--
John Hickin Bell-Northern Research, Montreal, Quebec
(514) 765-7924 hickin@bnr.ca
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy
is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<47t2s1$ivm@bmtlh10.bnr.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!mattShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt From: "john (j.d.) hickin" <hickin@bnr.ca> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: An Extra Virtual Destructor Question to Ponder Date: 09 Nov 1995 19:27:55 GMT Organization: Bell-Northern Research Approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern) Message-ID: <47t2s1$ivm@bmtlh10.bnr.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu