Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2491Re: New treatment of 'for (int i ...'
From: Mike Ferrel
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 01:12
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 01:12
29 lines
1457 bytes
1457 bytes
In article <sjcDHqMKM.MBG@netcom.com>, sjc@netcom.com (Steven Correll) wrote:
> Must portable programs do this?
>
> for (unsigned i0 = 0; ...; ...)
> ...
> for (unsigned i1 = 0; ...; ...)
> ...
How about
unsigned i;
for(i = 0; ...; ...)
...
for(i = 0; ...; ...)
...
This works for all compilers, and is what we all did before we could
declare it in the loop anyway. I have used it to go back and forth
between CodeWarrior, which implements the new scope, and Borland which
does the old.
--
Mike Ferrel
Sonoma State University
mferrel@zippy.sonoma.edu
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy
is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<mferrel-0911951136400001@sa-1en64.sonoma.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-backReferences:
<47itjt$65m@lhc.nlm.nih.gov> <sjcDHqMKM.MBG@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-back Date: 10 Nov 95 01:12:59 GMT Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au From: mferrel@zippy.sonoma.edu (Mike Ferrel) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: New treatment of 'for (int i ...' X-Original-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 1995 11:36:40 -0700 Organization: Sonoma State University Message-ID: <mferrel-0911951136400001@sa-1en64.sonoma.edu> References: <47itjt$65m@lhc.nlm.nih.gov> <sjcDHqMKM.MBG@netcom.com> X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUBMKKnKuEDnX0m9pzZAQHAOwF+MMdNP1BJS4jjKg0n4da6da+MISmHsv9k tYrV8A5IKbGSjcyoOL5+3Yuu4ZuLaTME =XYqs