Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #260declarations in for loops
From: Jim ADCOCK
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 1990 19:36
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 1990 19:36
15 lines
769 bytes
769 bytes
Proposed:
That the traditional C++ ability to declare variables in for loops
be maintained, and maintain its traditional meanings, for example:
doFoo()
{
for (int i=0; i<100; ++i)
for (int j=0; j<i; ++j)
doSomething(i,j);
}
*is* legal, and i's and j's scopes extend to the end of doFoo().
[disclaimer: this represents the opinions of an individual C++ user]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<56168@microsoft.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker!usc!wuarchive!uunet!microsoft!jimadShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!snorkelwacker!usc!wuarchive!uunet!microsoft!jimad From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: declarations in for loops Message-ID: <56168@microsoft.UUCP> Date: 30 Jul 90 19:36:10 GMT Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK) Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 15