Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2670Re: STL allocator spec broken?
From: Jim Chapman
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 02:43
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 1995 02:43
23 lines
1603 bytes
1603 bytes
In article pv2@boogie.cs.utexas.edu, wilson@cs.utexas.edu (Paul Wilson) writes: > [...] > As I understand it, ObjectSpace STL does support per-instance specification > of allocators, although I'm unclear on the details and whether it actually > works the way I'd like. > [...] I share your preference in this matter. With the ObjectSpace STL, the container class constructors take an optional allocator argument. I find that this serves my purposes better than the allocator-as-template- argument model. --- ==== AT&T | Jim Chapman | =--=== Global | Multimedia Projects | jbc@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM =--=== Information | 100 N. Sepulveda Blvd. | Voice: (310) 524-6747 ==== Solutions | El Segundo, CA 90245 | FAX: (310) 524-5515 --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<48thqe$hma@rap.SanDiegoCA.ATTGIS.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-backReferences:
<48leps$pv2@boogie.cs.utexas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!in1.uu.net!bounce-back Date: 22 Nov 95 02:43:40 GMT Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au From: Jim Chapman <jbc@elsegundoca.attgis.com> Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: STL allocator spec broken? X-Original-Date: 21 Nov 1995 21:54:22 GMT Organization: AT&T Global Information Solutions Message-ID: <48thqe$hma@rap.SanDiegoCA.ATTGIS.COM> References: <48leps$pv2@boogie.cs.utexas.edu> Reply-To: jbc@elsegundoca.attgis.com X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++ iQBFAgUBMLKOfOEDnX0m9pzZAQFyMQF/c/RD8p62glDLLGL0zSeNbU8ryOxuajl3 UvDLIcjm78vgVc/AhrsvZcqg9BQIX6G2 =C1+h