Article View: comp.std.c++
Article #2812Re: Array Initialization
From: Ralph Shnelvar
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:21
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 22:21
20 lines
1218 bytes
1218 bytes
fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson) wrote: >>IMHO the most important reason to disallow RT-sized arrays >>is that then sizeof also becomes a RT-size. > >A fair point -- but would that really cause any problems? I see two possibilities. First sizeof(RT) would be flagged as a syntax error, or it computes the size correctly. Ralph Shnelvar "We make tape drives work like disk drives" President http://www.ecnet.com/tpd/index.html TAPEDISK Corporation --- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu. Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu. The moderation policy is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<30be2bfa.13144651@meg.tesser.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!mattReferences:
<496gnn$hdh@treflan.shout.net> <DIpo69.DGF@falcon.daytonoh.attgis.com> <49felu$68m@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <9533411.19718@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!128.32.155.1!matt From: ralphs@tesser.com (Ralph Shnelvar) Newsgroups: comp.std.c++ Subject: Re: Array Initialization Date: 30 Nov 1995 22:21:41 GMT Organization: Tesser, LLC Approved: matt@physics2.Berkeley.EDU (Matt Austern) Message-ID: <30be2bfa.13144651@meg.tesser.com> References: <496gnn$hdh@treflan.shout.net> <DIpo69.DGF@falcon.daytonoh.attgis.com> <49felu$68m@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <9533411.19718@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu