🚀 go-pugleaf

>>>>> On 30 Nov 1995 17:52:37 GMT, martelli@cadlab.it (Alex Martelli)
said:

    Alex> 	shape *s = new(pstore) shape(pstore);

    Alex> Basically, while it _might_ perhaps be nice to have syntax sugar to
    Alex> avoid having to write pstore twice in this way, I do not think there
    Alex> is really any burning need for such sugar...

I'm not that much of syntactic-sugar guy, but tell me how you would do
this if you needed to allocate an array of objects? 

Doesn't anyone else feel there needs to be a link between the
placement-expression and the constructor? I'm curious 'cos I get the
feeling I'm missing something... 
-- 
Peace.... +<:-)

Anil


---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]