STL still in standard

Article View: comp.std.c++

Article #3022

#3022

From: Alain Dresse
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 18:04

13 lines
1071 bytes

I have heard about considerations on removing STL from the
C++ standard because it is error prone.

Could anyone confirm or deny this information ?

If this is the case, what would be considered to replace STL ?

Alain Dresse
adresse@ulb.ac.be
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4dd7on$djk@rc1.vub.ac.be>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!chronicle.mti.sgi.com!austern

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!chronicle.mti.sgi.com!austern
From: Alain Dresse <adresse@ulb.ac.be>
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: STL still in standard
Date: 16 Jan 1996 10:04:34 PST
Organization: Brussels Free Universities VUB/ULB
Approved: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com
Message-ID: <4dd7on$djk@rc1.vub.ac.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: isolde.mti.sgi.com
X-Original-Date: 15 Jan 1996 09:45:59 GMT
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
 iQBVAwUBMPvozEy4NqrwXLNJAQGQVgH/Rawa+0XKIOXPdtzIVW5bEz7xF2rOJLFv
 rygWYLMDu+XTPjnLicwnXoVOlm1L0cjS/SBZY1GAiUsH2eZdmBeD6g==
 =+Ktr
Originator: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com