🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi!
I would like to suggest returning to the definition of auto_ptr. The fact
is, in current form it is almost unusable for most things due to its
underlining concept of a single strict ownership. Actually, we need
multiple-instance auto_ptr. If, as I suspect, its inclusion was prevented
by the problem of efficiently allocating the counter in ref.counted
pointer, then we could parameterize auto_ptr WRT not only the type, but
allocator as well. Also, we could use doubly-linked list instead. And
anyway, it is the implementation problem!
             Cheers                    Genie

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Eugene V. Radchenko           Research associate, Computer Chemistry
E-mail: eugene@qsar.chem.msu.su                Fax: +7-(095)939-0290 
Ordinary mail:  Chair of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry,
                      Moscow State University, 119899 Moscow, Russia
*****************  Disappearances are deceptive  *******************
---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  Submission address: std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu.
  Contact address: std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu.  The moderation policy
  is summarized in http://dogbert.lbl.gov/~matt/std-c++/policy.html. ]